Ownership / Country of origin
Who owns Vietnam's SPC flooring factories, and is your floor really made in Vietnam?
Vietnamese, Chinese or international? Graded ownership for published Vietnam SPC factory records, and why US origin depends on where the floor is made.

Short answer
Some Vietnam SPC factories are Vietnamese-owned, some belong to Chinese groups and some to international groups. Ownership does not set US origin: a floor is Vietnamese when its core is made and the plank finished in Vietnam. In our view, buyers spend too long on the owner's nationality and too little on where the core is extruded and where the resin came from. Ask for evidence tied to your order.
Ownership matters for your contract, forced-labour checks and supplier concentration. It does not set US origin.
US origin follows where the core is made and the plank is finished. Ask where the core is extruded before anything else.
A foreign-owned plant that extrudes the core in Vietnam can be a stronger origin case than a Vietnamese-owned plant that buys core board in.
Is a Vietnamese SPC factory a Chinese company?
Sometimes. Some SPC plants in Vietnam are Vietnamese-owned. Others are Vietnamese-registered companies owned by Chinese, Singaporean or international groups. Our reading of the evidence is that Vietnamese firms are the majority by count, while Chinese-invested plants carry a large share of what ships to the US. That split is contested, so we do not put a percentage on it.
The question “Is this brand Chinese?” is really three questions, and only one of them sets your US duty.
| Question | What proves it | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Where is the company registered? | Business registration certificate, tax code, legal name | Who owns it, or where goods are made |
| Who owns it? | Investment registration certificate, shareholder records, group filings, provincial permits | Where a given shipment was made |
| Where was your floor made? | Production records, bill of materials, line photos, certificate of origin for that shipment | Who owns the company |
If ownership matters to you, ask for the investment registration certificate first. For a foreign-invested project it names the investor. Provincial environmental permit reports can name the owner too. That is how BBL Home’s Singapore holding was identified, and it is better evidence than any trade directory.
Who owns the factories in our published records?
Grades: “Confirmed” means a primary or strong source supports it. “Probable” means the evidence points that way but has not been closed out. “Not confirmed” means we have not found reliable evidence, so we do not state an owner.
| Factory record | Location | Operating company | Owner or group | Confidence | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Huali Group Vietnam | Diem Thuy Industrial Park, Thai Nguyen | Huali Group Vietnam | Part of China’s Huali Group | Confirmed | Trade data and group roster |
| BBL Home | Dong Mai Industrial Park, Quang Yen, Quang Ninh | BBL Home New Materials Co., Ltd | BBL Home Home Holding PTE. LTD, Singapore-registered. The owner behind it: not confirmed | Confirmed (Singapore holding) | Quang Ninh provincial permit report, 2024 |
| Vietnam Sentai | Yen Binh Industrial Park, Pho Yen, Thai Nguyen | Vietnam Sentai Environmental Protection New Materials Technology Co., Ltd | Part of China’s Anhui Sentai group | Probable | Company group page and secondary rosters |
| NEO FLOOR | MP Dinh Vu Industrial Park, Hai Phong | NEO FLOOR JSC | Member of Pha Le Group, Vietnamese, listed in Ho Chi Minh City | Confirmed | Company website and filings |
| AMY | Thai Hoa, Lien Son, Lien Hoa Industrial Park, Phu Tho (former Vinh Phuc) | Asia US Industrial JSC | AMY GRUPO, a Vietnamese-owned group | Probable | Vietnamese business press, 2026 |
| CFL | Plants in southern Vietnam; northern plant near Hai Phong announced 2024 | Vietnamese entity not confirmed | Belgian-founded group with headquarters in Adairsville, Georgia, US | Probable | Company and trade press |
| An Cuong | An Phat High-Tech and An Dong industrial parks, Hai Phong (former Hai Duong) | An Cuong High-tech Building Materials JSC | Subsidiary of An Phat Holdings, Vietnam. Not the An Cuong wood company | Confirmed | Parent company page |
| VN EcoFloor | Kim Binh Industrial Cluster, Ninh Binh (former Ha Nam) | VN EcoFloor JSC, formerly Kien An Plastic JSC | Vietnamese; shares business history with ANZ Flooring | Probable | Company website and catalogue |
| ANZ Flooring | Nam Son Industrial Zone, Ba Che, Quang Ninh | ANZ Flooring JSC | Vietnamese; shares business history with VN EcoFloor | Probable | Company website and catalogue |
| ATT Floor | Three listed addresses, Ninh Binh (former Ha Nam) | An Thinh Tien Plastic JSC | Vietnamese-registered; owners not researched | Not confirmed | Company website |
| VFLOOR | Cam Thuong Industrial Cluster, Hanoi | Havitech Production JSC | Vietnamese-registered; owners not researched | Not confirmed | Company website and declaration |
| Hai Phat | Dinh Vu area, Hai Phong | Hai Phat New Material JSC | Not researched | Not confirmed | Company introduction |
| Hengli | Tan Hung, former Bac Giang area | Vietnam Hengli New Materials Co., Ltd | Not researched | Not confirmed | Company website |
Two notes on reading it.
VN EcoFloor and ANZ Flooring share business history. If you want two plants so that one can cover for the other, do not count these as independent until a corporate check says so. Two quotes from related plants may be one supplier with two addresses.
“Not confirmed” is not a warning. It means the owner is not documented in our research yet. Each factory record lists the sources we have read and what is still open.
When does ownership actually matter?
Our view: buyers give ownership too much weight on customs and too little on three other things.
Forced-labour exposure. US forced-labour risk for SPC centres on PVC made in Xinjiang. Trade press reported about 1,000 containers held at US ports after some Chinese-owned Vietnam plants were blacklisted; the firms were not named (probable). The owner’s nationality does not make resin good or bad. It changes where we would look first: a plant that buys resin through a parent group’s Chinese supply chain should be able to trace it, and we would ask to see that trace before the first order, not after a hold.
Who decides. In a group-owned plant, price, capacity and claims decisions may sit with the parent rather than the people you meet in Vietnam. We would want to know who signs the contract and who settles a claim. A friendly local sales team is not the same as a counterparty with authority.
Concentration. If your two “different” suppliers belong to one group, or share owners, a problem at the group is a problem for both. This is the most common blind spot we would expect in a dual-supplier plan.
What we would not bother with on a standard order: chasing the ultimate owner behind every Singapore holding. Our own research has left that question open for several plants. It is slow and often ends without an answer. We would do it only when the contract, a sanctions screen or the size of the programme justifies the cost. For everything else, the production records for your order are worth more than a corporate chart.
Is Vietnam SPC really made in Vietnam?
Most of it can be, but the answer belongs to each product and each shipment, not to the country or the brand. US origin is the country of manufacture, or the country where the goods were substantially transformed into a new article (19 CFR 134.1(b)). Ownership plays no part in that test.
Two CBP rulings show where the line falls for SPC. In N323990 (2022), the wear layer, bottom layer and backing came from China, and the core was made in Vietnam from Vietnamese, Swiss and Chinese raw materials. The layers were pressed, cut and click-profiled in Vietnam. CBP found Vietnamese origin. In N350880 (2025), SPC sheets made in China, Vietnam or Malaysia were cut, profiled and padded in Panama, and CBP found Panama origin on those facts. A ruling covers only the transaction it describes. Someone else’s ruling is a guide, not cover for your shipment.
How we rank the origin position. This is our assessment, not a legal test:
| What happens in Vietnam | Our view of the origin position |
|---|---|
| Core compounded and extruded, decor and wear layers laminated, then UV coating, cutting, click profiling and packing | Strongest. The plank is made here from raw materials |
| Core extruded in Vietnam, decor film and wear layer imported | Strong. Imported films are normal inputs |
| Finished core board imported, then laminated and profiled in Vietnam | Weaker. Get broker advice or a ruling for your exact process |
| Nearly finished planks imported, then padded, coated or packed | Weak. Expect close scrutiny |
The question that sorts most conversations: where is the core extruded, and can you show the extruders and the resin purchase records for my order? A factory that answers with a video of the extrusion line and a resin invoice is in a different category from one that answers with a certificate.
Worked example: two quotes, two owners
Here is where we think buyers most often get it backwards. Take two quotes at the same price.
- Plant A is owned by a Chinese group. It extrudes the core in Vietnam and laminates imported film.
- Plant B is Vietnamese-owned. It buys finished core board from outside the plant, then laminates and profiles it.
On a slide, Plant B looks safer. On the origin ladder above, Plant A has the stronger case. Now put numbers on the risk. As of 26 October 2026, Vietnamese-origin SPC pays the 5.3% general duty plus 12.5% Section 301 duty, 17.8% in total. Chinese-origin SPC pays those plus a further 25%, 42.8% in total. The average US customs value of this flooring from Vietnam was about USD 8.0/m² in 2025, and a 20ft container holds roughly 2,000 m² of 5 mm SPC with pad.
| One 20ft container, about USD 16,000 customs value | Duty |
|---|---|
| Vietnamese origin accepted (17.8%) | about USD 2,848 |
| Treated as Chinese origin (42.8%) | about USD 6,848 |
| Gap per container | about USD 4,000 |
| Gap on a 20-container year | about USD 80,000 |
Those are duty figures only, before fees, delays or any penalty. The point is not that Plant B’s floor would be found Chinese. It may not be. The point is that Plant B’s origin depends on where its core board comes from, and the owner’s nationality tells you nothing about that. We would take Plant A, ask for its resin trace, and put the extrusion site into the purchase order. If Plant B were the better product, we would get broker advice on its exact process before the first deposit. Rates and sources are in our US tariffs monitor.
Imported inputs and messy shipping records
Vietnam’s SPC industry relies on imported PVC resin and imported decor film and wear layer, much of it from China. Our research grades this as probable: the direction is solid, but published percentages are estimates, so we do not quote them. NEO FLOOR states that a large share of its inputs are local and that its group owns calcium carbonate quarries. That is a company statement, a good question to follow up, not a verified share.
| Input | Usually comes from | What we would ask |
|---|---|---|
| PVC resin | Mostly imported, much from China (probable) | Resin supplier and purchase records for the batch. This is your forced-labour file |
| Decor film and wear layer | Mostly imported, mostly China (probable) | Little, for origin. Usually treated as components if the plank is made in Vietnam |
| Calcium carbonate | Domestic deposits in Vietnam (probable) | Where it comes from, as part of the bill of materials |
| SPC core board | Should be made in the plant | If it is bought in: from where, and has a broker looked at it |
Public US bill-of-lading data sometimes shows a Vietnamese shipper with “China”, “South Korea”, “Singapore”, “Hong Kong” or “Malaysia” as the origin (probable; cause not confirmed). A load port typed into the wrong field is a likely explanation. We would not drop a supplier over it. We would make sure our own invoice, packing list, certificate of origin and entry data all name the same country, plant and address, and ask the forwarder to fix any record that does not.
What origin evidence should you request?
Ask for one pack per factory and one per order, before the deposit, so the answers go into the contract. The per-order pack matters because a plant you checked once can still place part of an order elsewhere when it is busy. From a desk, you cannot see that. Records tied to your purchase order can.
For the factory (once)
- Business registration certificate with legal name, tax code and registered address
- Investment registration certificate, if the company has a foreign investor
- Production address for each plant, matching certificates and invoices
- Dated photos or video of the extrusion, lamination, UV and profiling lines
For your order (every time)
- Bill of materials with the origin of each input: resin, filler, decor film, wear layer, pad
- Resin supplier name and purchase records for the batch used
- Production records for your purchase order: dates, line, batch numbers
- Certificate of origin for the shipment, naming the same plant
- Pre-shipment inspection at the named plant, with the inspector confirming the address and production in progress
If a factory cannot show where the core is extruded, treat that as the answer.
Common mistakes
- Screening suppliers by the owner’s passport. It filters out sound plants and lets through weak origin cases with a local name.
- Asking sales for a certificate instead of the bill of materials. The certificate is the claim. The bill of materials and resin records are the proof.
- Checking the plant once and never the order. Origin is decided shipment by shipment.
- Leaving the resin trace until a container is held. By then you are building the file under pressure.
- Counting related plants as backup. Shared owners can mean shared problems.
Our view
Ownership is a question for your contract and your forced-labour file. Origin is a question about the extruder. Keep them apart, and spend most of your effort on the second, because that is where the 25-point duty gap sits. We would rather buy from a foreign-owned plant that extrudes the core in Vietnam and shows its resin records than from a Vietnamese-owned finisher that cannot say where its core board comes from.
Start with the factory directory to see the ownership and documents published for each plant. Our team in Hanoi can shortlist factories and manage production for your order, including the origin pack.
Questions buyers ask
Is BBL Home a Chinese company?
A Quang Ninh provincial permit report names the owner of BBL Home New Materials Co., Ltd as BBL Home Home Holding PTE. LTD, a Singapore-registered company (confirmed). Who stands behind the Singapore holding is not confirmed in our research. Reports that call it Chinese-owned are secondary, so we do not state it.
Should I avoid Chinese-owned factories in Vietnam?
Not on ownership alone, in our view. Judge the plant on where it extrudes the core, whether it can trace its resin, and who has authority to sign and settle claims. Those decide your origin and forced-labour risk.
How can I check who owns a Vietnamese factory?
Ask for the investment registration certificate, which names the foreign investor where there is one, and match the legal name and tax code to the business registration. Provincial environmental permit reports, where published, can also name the owner.
Is there a US anti-dumping case on Vietnamese SPC?
Our research found none on Vietnamese vinyl flooring as of 26 October 2026. Plywood from Vietnam did receive final anti-dumping and countervailing duties on 21 July 2026, so we would not assume flooring stays untouched.
Does US customs check where Vietnamese flooring is made?
It can. US and Vietnamese customs worked together on more than 35 origin-fraud cases between 2019 and May 2025, and held a workshop on factory and production verification in July 2026 (probable). Expect questions about production, not ownership.
Sources & further reading
- eCFR: 19 CFR Part 134, country of origin marking (definition of country of origin, 134.1(b))
- CBP ruling N323990 (22 Feb 2022): country of origin of SPC flooring produced in Vietnam
- CBP ruling N350880 (15 Jul 2025): country of origin of SPC planks finished in Panama
- Quang Ninh provincial environmental permit report for BBL Home New Materials (May 2024)
- NEO FLOOR: company and factory information (Pha Le Group)
- Huali Floors: company information
- Vietnam Sentai: company information
- VnExpress: AMY GRUPO at ten years (April 2026)
- CFL Flooring: company information
- VN EcoFloor: company information
Authorship, affiliations & disclosure
Prepared by our team from our graded research ledger, factory and government documents, US customs rulings and public trade data. Ownership grades show what the evidence supports today: confirmed, probable or not confirmed. We are not customs counsel; confirm origin questions with a licensed customs broker. We offer factory selection and production management as a separate service.
Corrections & editorial informationContinue exploring.
The reading roomHow many m² of SPC flooring fit in a 20ft or 40ft container?
SPC containers fill by weight, not volume. Weight per m² by thickness, container payloads, US road limits and a worked example for a 20ft and a 40ft high cube.
Read the featureUS tariffs on SPC flooring from Vietnam in 2026: what applies today
As of 26 October 2026: the HTS 3918.10 rate, the 12.5% Section 301 duty on Vietnam, the China comparison, AD/CVD, UFLPA and EAPA, with a worked example.
Read the featureRead the certificate, not the badge.
The company, product, site and dates behind a flooring certificate matter more than the logo on a supplier presentation.
Read the feature

